SQL Server
SQL Server
Tips on Matching Encryption with another System
See more Encryption Examples
This example provides tips on matching encryption results produced by another system.Chilkat SQL Server Downloads
-- Important: See this note about string length limitations for strings returned by sp_OAMethod calls.
--
CREATE PROCEDURE ChilkatSample
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @hr int
-- Important: Do not use nvarchar(max). See the warning about using nvarchar(max).
DECLARE @sTmp0 nvarchar(4000)
-- This example assumes the Chilkat API to have been previously unlocked.
-- See Global Unlock Sample for sample code.
DECLARE @crypt int
EXEC @hr = sp_OACreate 'Chilkat.Crypt2', @crypt OUT
IF @hr <> 0
BEGIN
PRINT 'Failed to create ActiveX component'
RETURN
END
-- Let's examine 256-bit AES encryption in CBC mode.
-- CBC mode is Cipher Block Chaining, and it uses an IV (initialization vector)
EXEC sp_OASetProperty @crypt, 'CryptAlgorithm', 'aes'
EXEC sp_OASetProperty @crypt, 'CipherMode', 'cbc'
EXEC sp_OASetProperty @crypt, 'KeyLength', 256
EXEC sp_OASetProperty @crypt, 'PaddingScheme', 0
DECLARE @ivHex1 nvarchar(4000)
SELECT @ivHex1 = '000102030405060708090A0B0C0D0E0F'
DECLARE @ivHex2 nvarchar(4000)
SELECT @ivHex2 = 'FF0102030405060708090A0B0C0D0E0F'
EXEC sp_OAMethod @crypt, 'SetEncodedIV', NULL, @ivHex1, 'hex'
DECLARE @keyHex nvarchar(4000)
SELECT @keyHex = '000102030405060708090A0B0C0D0E0F101112131415161718191A1B1C1D1E1F'
EXEC sp_OAMethod @crypt, 'SetEncodedKey', NULL, @keyHex, 'hex'
-- Matching encryption requires all of the above settings to be matched exactly.
-- Let's get our output in hex format so we can easily see the values of the encrypted bytes.
EXEC sp_OASetProperty @crypt, 'EncodingMode', 'hex'
-- Encrypt something small:
EXEC sp_OAMethod @crypt, 'EncryptStringENC', @sTmp0 OUT, 'Hello'
PRINT @sTmp0
-- The result is 5B827AB3B4F9F2292C2B74C8A6C99A3D
-- This 16 bytes -- exactly one AES encryption block.
-- Let's change only the padding scheme.
EXEC sp_OASetProperty @crypt, 'PaddingScheme', 3
-- Encrypt again:
EXEC sp_OAMethod @crypt, 'EncryptStringENC', @sTmp0 OUT, 'Hello'
PRINT @sTmp0
-- The result is entirely different: 469C28CC576069F807891FEE2DE76D68
-- The padding scheme only affects the very last block of output. Therefore,
-- if all settings match except for the padding scheme, we're unable to
-- know if we encrypt a very small amount of data. However, if we encrypt
-- a larger amount of data, the single difference becomes apparent:
PRINT '-- Only the padding scheme differs --'
EXEC sp_OASetProperty @crypt, 'PaddingScheme', 0
EXEC sp_OAMethod @crypt, 'EncryptStringENC', @sTmp0 OUT, 'HelloHelloHelloHelloHelloHelloHello'
PRINT @sTmp0
EXEC sp_OASetProperty @crypt, 'PaddingScheme', 3
EXEC sp_OAMethod @crypt, 'EncryptStringENC', @sTmp0 OUT, 'HelloHelloHelloHelloHelloHelloHello'
PRINT @sTmp0
-- Now examine the outputs:
-- F6A201F8E0B6595FA20E4A212A2AD9A5046DAF29E8B35AD15CEE56A1A69F2A3A7B347A7C15E26E7A6760533C7A8E0D44
-- F6A201F8E0B6595FA20E4A212A2AD9A5046DAF29E8B35AD15CEE56A1A69F2A3A292CA61D03A85E1AC39B50D4DA71691E
-- We can see the output matches except for the last block, which is affected by the padding scheme.
-- If we are able to easily use ECB mode w/ the other system
-- we are trying to match, then eliminate the IV from the picture.
-- If the encryption matches in ECB mode, but not in CBC mode,
-- then we know all correct except for the IV.
-- For example, you can see how the IV changes everything with CBC mode,
-- but it's not used in ECB mode:
EXEC sp_OASetProperty @crypt, 'PaddingScheme', 0
EXEC sp_OASetProperty @crypt, 'CipherMode', 'cbc'
PRINT '-- Only the IV differs, CBC mode produces different output. --'
EXEC sp_OAMethod @crypt, 'SetEncodedIV', NULL, @ivHex1, 'hex'
EXEC sp_OAMethod @crypt, 'EncryptStringENC', @sTmp0 OUT, 'HelloHelloHelloHelloHelloHelloHello'
PRINT @sTmp0
EXEC sp_OAMethod @crypt, 'SetEncodedIV', NULL, @ivHex2, 'hex'
EXEC sp_OAMethod @crypt, 'EncryptStringENC', @sTmp0 OUT, 'HelloHelloHelloHelloHelloHelloHello'
PRINT @sTmp0
EXEC sp_OASetProperty @crypt, 'CipherMode', 'ecb'
PRINT '-- Only the IV differs, ECB does not use the IV. The outputs are the same. --'
EXEC sp_OAMethod @crypt, 'SetEncodedIV', NULL, @ivHex1, 'hex'
EXEC sp_OAMethod @crypt, 'EncryptStringENC', @sTmp0 OUT, 'HelloHelloHelloHelloHelloHelloHello'
PRINT @sTmp0
EXEC sp_OAMethod @crypt, 'SetEncodedIV', NULL, @ivHex2, 'hex'
EXEC sp_OAMethod @crypt, 'EncryptStringENC', @sTmp0 OUT, 'HelloHelloHelloHelloHelloHelloHello'
PRINT @sTmp0
-- If we can eliminate the padding scheme and IV from the degrees of freedom,
-- then the only remaining likely differences are (1) the secret key,
-- and (2) the input data itself.
-- The secret key is composed of binary bytes of exactly KeyLength bits.
-- For 256-bit AES encrytion, the key length is 256, and therefore the
-- secret key is exactly 32 bytes. (32 * 8 bits/byte = 256 bits)
-- If the secret key is derived from an arbitrary password string, then one must
-- exactly duplicate the derivation scheme (such as PBKDF2, for example)
-- The input bytes to the derivation scheme must also match. For example,
-- is it the utf-8 byte representation of the password string that is used
-- as the starting point for the derivation, or perhaps utf-16, or ANSI (1 byte per char)?
-- Likewise, if the data being encrypted is a string, what byte representation of
-- the string is being encrypted? If the bytes presented to the encryptor are different,
-- then the output is different.
EXEC @hr = sp_OADestroy @crypt
END
GO